The less-is-more approach to robotic cable management
By Process Online Staff
Tuesday, 10 October, 2017
Cable issues have been cited as the number one reason for downtime in robotics cells, so the way in which robot cables are attached and guided is important for robot reliability.
In recent years, cable management has come into the limelight because machine reliability has increased dramatically, even though robots have grown more complex. Unfortunately, the methods used to attach and guide cables have not quite followed suit. While managing cables and hoses is often an afterthought in most designs, it is truly a vital part of any well-functioning robot.
Since the 1960s, cable management methods for robots have not changed dramatically. Most experts agree that one of the top blunders made is underestimating cable management issues. For instance, during a conference hosted in 2008 by the Robotic Industries Association (RIA)1, a group of leading system integrators cited cable issues as the number one reason for downtime in robotics cells. Headaches range from tangled and corkscrewed cables to complete breaks that cause downtime, lost revenue and damaged reputations.
This is why the ways in which robot cables are attached and guided is important. The less-is-more approach to cable management is a best practice that robotics engineers and integrators can apply. It centres on designing cable management systems for six-axis robots — including cables, hoses, tubing, carriers and connectors — in three separate sections.
Overview of industrial robots
The term ‘robot’ is defined as a machine capable of carrying out a complex series of motions automatically. It was first introduced in a Czech science-fiction play; then, in 1942, the term ‘robotics’ was coined by Isaac Asimov, a well-known American author and professor of biochemistry at Boston University.2
By the 1970s robotics had made its way into most manufacturing facilities, predominately in the automotive industry, and by 1980 more than 4000 robots were being used in the US. Fast forward nearly 40 years, and more than 2.6 million industrial robots are predicted to have made their way into manufacturing plants throughout the world.3
During the evolution of robotics, many different types of robots emerged. Some of the most common are:
- Cartesian (gantry or linear): rectangular arms described as using x, y or z axes.
- Spherical (polar): one linear axis and two rotational axes around the vertical shoulder joints.
- Jointed-arm (6-axis articulated): rotating shoulder and elbow in horizontal axes.
- SCARA (selective compliance assembly robot arm): special jointed-arm version.
- Cylindrical (post-type): three degrees of freedom, y and z linear movements, rotating base.
What do all these robots have in common? The cable management system is typically left to the last minute, but without it, unprotected cables are likely to fail. Cable damage can shut down the most important robot on the line, which leads to costly downtime.
The less-is-more approach for six-axis robots
Current systems try to keep the cables on a six-axis robot static while everything operating around them is dynamic. Using one, long restrictive cable package prevents movement in sync with the robot. Restrictions stress cables, which accelerates failure. Often technicians severely bind cables with excessive dress packs (protective coverings on cables), cable ties and even duct tape. The goal is to minimise tangling and interference with the machine, but these types of solutions cause corkscrewing and failure.
Figure 1: Dividing the robot into three separate sections.
Instead, consider a six-axis robot as three separate sections:
- The sixth to third axis.
- The third to second axis.
- The second to first axis.
This breakdown is the key to longer-lasting cables. Each cable section needs a minimal dress pack, strain relief with service loops, and a junction box that contains and protects the electrical connectors joining the cables.
Use of a strain relief mechanism can eliminate stresses and extend the service life of a moving cable. This strain relief may consist of standard elements such as tie wrap plates or clamps. Engineers should ensure the cables are in the neutral axis, not touching the inner or outer radius of the cable management system.
From the sixth to third axis:
- Strain relief cables on the moving end (sixth axis) with a 30–60 cm service loop.
- Protect cables and hoses with a modular, multi-axis cable carrier.
- Separate cables at the third axis and install a junction box for diagnostics and cable replacement.
From the third to second axis:
- Strain relief cables on the third axis with a 30–60 cm service loop.
- Use a modular, multi-axis cable carrier.
- Separate cables and install a junction box at the second axis.
From the second to first axis:
- Strain relief cables on the second axis with a 30–60 cm service loop.
- Multi-axis, reverse bend radius (RBR) cable carrier, protecting and guiding rotating cables.
- Separate cables and install a junction box at the first axis.
Separating the dress pack into three shorter sections prevents it from wrapping, catching or snagging on machines and minimises stress on cables and hoses. This approach applies to any six-axis robot, regardless of manufacturer or application. While other fixes such as duct tape and ties wraps might cost less and work temporarily, in the long run, properly designed dress packs reduce unnecessary downtime and maintenance costs.
Six-axis robots can be found in applications such as general factory automation, welding, painting, machine tools, handling machines, packaging machines, and many more.
In addition to the appropriate dress pack, it is imperative that six-axis robots use dynamic cables specifically designed for continuous flexing. Two important features to take into account are a cable’s torsion resistance and shielding. Shielded cables face a greater risk of failure because constant movements can easily compromise the cable jacket. Use unshielded, high-flex cables whenever possible to avoid problems. If this is not an option, turn to special ‘rolling flex’ cables.
Cable management options
There are different options available for guiding and protecting cables on six-axis robots. Three well-known solutions include flexible tubing, enclosed dress packs and robotic cable carrier systems.
Corrugated or flexible tubing is one option for protecting cables on six-axis robots and is available in a wide range of sizes and styles. It has superior tear resistance at connection points and a long service life, even with reverse bend cycles.
However, corrugated tubing has its limitations. It delivers minimal torsion resistance and can only be fixed at two points with a defined length. The tubing can also stretch as the robot moves, which puts undue stress on the cables. Tooling interference sometimes occurs because there is no control path for movement.
Enclosed dress pack
An enclosed dress pack mounts directly to the robot and is available in multiple configurations. It uses corrugated tubing installed inside a plastic-reinforced housing to protect cables. The system’s spring-loaded design minimises catch and pinch points.
Due to the completely enclosed housing, cable maintenance is difficult and, because it is not modular, the entire unit must be replaced if one component breaks. Problems can also arise if the programming or movements of the robot change. This is because an enclosed dress pack does not prevent the cables from exceeding their maximum bend radius.
Robotic cable carriers
Robotic cable carrier systems are at the core of the less-is-more approach, and can be used universally for six-axis robots. The system mounts directly to the robot and is available in multiple configurations. Like an enclosed dress pack, it has a spring-loaded design, which minimises catch and pinch points. However, robotic cable carriers offer additional benefits not available with other systems. They can come equipped with strain relief options to extend the service life of the cables, and cables can be quickly added or removed without dismantling the system. The defined bend radius of a robotic cable carrier protects cables from exceeding their maximum bend radius.
Figure 2: Robotic cable carriers offer additional benefits not available with other systems.
The limitations of the system include minimal resistance to high-concentration acids and caustic chemicals, and the inability to handle circular movements with heavy loads.
Robotic cable carriers are well suited to welding robots in tight areas, multiple-tool applications, material handling jobs and de-burring operations. For added flexibility, robotic cable carriers are available in a fully enclosed design, in a pull-through design for easy cable access, or as a lightweight, low-cost system for applications that do not require cables to be completely enclosed.
Ideally, a robotic cable carrier system should allow sufficient clearance inside the cable carrier for electrical cables, pneumatic hoses and tubing for other media. This compensates for relative forces between cables and hoses. Cable carrier suppliers typically provide this data. For instance, general rules of thumb for robotic cable carriers include:
- Total cable and hose diameters must not exceed 60% of the carrier diameter.
- Leave at least a 10% clearance between any two cables or hoses.
- Cables and hoses need to move freely inside the carrier.
The less-is-more approach also eliminates some safety concerns within a robotics cell. Cables are able to move more freely, but are protected and guided properly so that they will not injure workers.
The ideal cable management system
Ideally, a robotic cable carrier system should:
- guide cables in one continuous path
- eliminate loose, unmanaged cables
- control the bend radius of cables to avoid pinching
- have the ability to quickly add or remove cables
- be available as a fully enclosed design for extremely harsh environments.
- E2.1 e-chains in April edition of 'Circuit'
- Mounting clamps for e-chains on cobots in March issue of 'Inside Robotics'
- Smart plastics for railway in February issue of 'New Zealand Engineering News'
- Plane-chain in February edition of 'Industry Update'
- Readychain® solution in November issue of 'Industry Update'
- E-chain with QR codes in November issue of 'Process Technology'
- P4.1 Roller chain in the June issue of 'Industry Update'
- Small e-chains in April issue of 'Process Technology'
- E-chains for safe shore-side power supply in December issue of 'Bulk Handling Review'
- Honeycomb strain relief system in January issue of 'ECD' Magazine